AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Julie Anne Watko

Examiner Julie Anne Watko appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 67.1%, they average 1.75 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.75
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-7597
Predicted Supervisor
Ke Xiao
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-7776
Tech Center
2600 - Communications
Group
2620 - Selective Visual Display Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
577
Granted Applications
387
Non-Granted Applications
190
Avg OA / Grant
1.75
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2627 , 2688 , 2695
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 67.1% 1.75
Art Unit 39 60.6% 1.74
Group 280 55.8% 1.99
Tech Center 1,729 59.3% 1.88
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 17 12 70.6%
2009 19 12 63.2%
2010 32 20 62.5%
2011 37 24 64.9%
2012 25 13 52.0%
2013 27 13 48.1%
2014 23 15 65.2%
2015 19 14 73.7%
2016 40 29 72.5%
2017 34 26 76.5%
2018 44 36 81.8%
2019 39 31 79.5%
2020 42 36 85.7%
2021 24 20 83.3%
2022 34 28 82.4%
2023 18 11 61.1%
2024 33 30 90.9%
2025 47 17 36.2%
2026 23 0 0.0%

387 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 570 0.4% 7.9% 62.8% 26.8%
2 246 0.8% 6.1% 72.4% 19.5%
3 93 0.0% 2.2% 78.5% 18.3%
4 51 0.0% 2.0% 86.3% 11.8%
5 21 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
6 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
8 5 20.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
4.2%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.3%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
2.9%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
4.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.