AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jay C. Kim

Examiner Jay C. Kim appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 44.1%, they average 3.54 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.54
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1620
Predicted Supervisor
Joshua Benitez
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1435
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2810 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
918
Granted Applications
405
Non-Granted Applications
513
Avg OA / Grant
3.54
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2815
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 44.1% 3.54
Art Unit 26 51.7% 2.24
Group 290 58.7% 1.79
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 24 5 20.8%
2009 45 16 35.6%
2010 45 23 51.1%
2011 43 27 62.8%
2012 53 26 49.1%
2013 40 8 20.0%
2014 63 25 39.7%
2015 47 22 46.8%
2016 45 18 40.0%
2017 49 17 34.7%
2018 48 23 47.9%
2019 54 24 44.4%
2020 55 37 67.3%
2021 51 33 64.7%
2022 46 30 65.2%
2023 61 35 57.4%
2024 49 26 53.1%
2025 63 10 15.9%
2026 37 0 0.0%

405 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 916 0.3% 11.8% 64.8% 21.0%
2 761 0.5% 8.7% 63.2% 26.7%
3 513 0.4% 7.6% 67.8% 23.6%
4 395 1.0% 8.1% 64.6% 25.6%
5 206 0.0% 3.9% 71.4% 24.3%
6 158 0.0% 5.7% 79.1% 15.2%
7 98 0.0% 6.1% 68.4% 25.5%
8 64 0.0% 7.8% 62.5% 29.7%
9 40 0.0% 7.5% 70.0% 22.5%
10 26 0.0% 7.7% 53.8% 38.5%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.7%
2011
0.5%
2012
0.5%
2013
1.5%
2014
1.1%
2015
0.5%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.6%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.6%
2021
1.2%
2022
1.1%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.