AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jasmine Clark

Examiner Jasmine Clark appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 92.1%, they average 1.33 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.33
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1726
Predicted Supervisor
Zandra Smith
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2429
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2810 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,324
Granted Applications
1,220
Non-Granted Applications
104
Avg OA / Grant
1.33
Last OA Observed
February 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2815 , 2816 , 2899
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 92.1% 1.33
Art Unit 20 74.8% 1.84
Group 290 58.7% 1.79
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 63 48 76.2%
2009 88 70 79.5%
2010 74 72 97.3%
2011 66 59 89.4%
2012 70 66 94.3%
2013 87 80 92.0%
2014 82 77 93.9%
2015 87 85 97.7%
2016 50 48 96.0%
2017 73 73 100.0%
2018 71 71 100.0%
2019 76 75 98.7%
2020 76 75 98.7%
2021 72 70 97.2%
2022 92 92 100.0%
2023 82 79 96.3%
2024 65 61 93.8%
2025 44 19 43.2%
2026 6 0 0.0%

1,220 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,323 1.0% 10.8% 38.6% 38.8%
2 317 0.0% 16.7% 50.8% 26.8%
3 76 0.0% 18.4% 55.3% 23.7%
4 27 3.7% 22.2% 63.0% 11.1%
5 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
2.9%
2009
0.0%
2010
1.1%
2011
0.0%
2012
1.7%
2013
2.1%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.1%
2017
1.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
1.1%
2021
0.8%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.4%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.