AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Hai Pham

Appears inactive Last observed office action: February 2013 (160 months ago).

Examiner Hai Pham appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 90.3%, they average 1.46 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.46
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2010-2013)
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2820 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
62
Granted Applications
56
Non-Granted Applications
6
Avg OA / Grant
1.46
Last OA Observed
February 2013 (160 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2824
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 90.3% 1.46
Art Unit 28 78.0% 1.45
Group 205 73.0% 1.64
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010 2011 2012 2013
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2010; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2010 1 1 100.0%
2011 28 25 89.3%
2012 28 25 89.3%
2013 5 5 100.0%
No observed data after 2013; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

56 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 62 1.6% 38.7% 50.0% 8.1%
2 23 0.0% 17.4% 73.9% 8.7%
3 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2010
2.4%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.