AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mohammed A Bashar

Examiner Mohammed A Bashar appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 87.8%, they average 1.32 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.32
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2013-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2908
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2820 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
663
Granted Applications
582
Non-Granted Applications
81
Avg OA / Grant
1.32
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2824 , 2827
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 87.8% 1.32
Art Unit 28 78.0% 1.45
Group 205 73.0% 1.64
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2013; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2013 1 1 100.0%
2014 51 42 82.4%
2015 49 39 79.6%
2016 54 50 92.6%
2017 52 51 98.1%
2018 56 56 100.0%
2019 59 57 96.6%
2020 48 47 97.9%
2021 52 52 100.0%
2022 44 44 100.0%
2023 55 55 100.0%
2024 53 49 92.5%
2025 71 39 54.9%
2026 18 0 0.0%

582 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 662 0.2% 6.2% 75.2% 3.2%
2 188 0.0% 10.6% 85.6% 1.1%
3 27 0.0% 0.0% 92.6% 3.7%
4 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.4%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.