AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Philip Cotey

Examiner Philip Cotey appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 79.6%, they average 1.21 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.21
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2013-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-1029
Predicted Supervisor
Laura Martin
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2160
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2850 - Printing / Measuring and Testing

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
778
Granted Applications
619
Non-Granted Applications
159
Avg OA / Grant
1.21
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2855 , 2856
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 79.6% 1.21
Art Unit 41 65.2% 1.51
Group 372 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2013; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2013 8 5 62.5%
2014 71 52 73.2%
2015 65 54 83.1%
2016 71 61 85.9%
2017 74 61 82.4%
2018 70 63 90.0%
2019 66 54 81.8%
2020 49 40 81.6%
2021 55 48 87.3%
2022 63 53 84.1%
2023 55 52 94.5%
2024 60 54 90.0%
2025 55 22 40.0%
2026 16 0 0.0%

619 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 777 0.1% 0.6% 90.2% 7.6%
2 137 0.0% 0.7% 94.9% 3.6%
3 22 0.0% 0.0% 86.4% 4.5%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.4%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.