AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Paul D. Kim

Examiner Paul D. Kim appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.1%, they average 1.59 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.59
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-4565
Predicted Supervisor
Aneeta Yodichkas
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-9773
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3720 - Manufacturing Devices and Processes, Machine Tools and Hand Tools

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,581
Granted Applications
1,329
Non-Granted Applications
252
Avg OA / Grant
1.59
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3729
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.1% 1.59
Art Unit 23 64.8% 1.77
Group 306 53.9% 1.76
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 118 98 83.1%
2009 86 66 76.7%
2010 94 71 75.5%
2011 88 80 90.9%
2012 84 79 94.0%
2013 95 87 91.6%
2014 90 80 88.9%
2015 104 90 86.5%
2016 76 60 78.9%
2017 83 68 81.9%
2018 85 74 87.1%
2019 81 78 96.3%
2020 89 80 89.9%
2021 70 69 98.6%
2022 73 69 94.5%
2023 79 73 92.4%
2024 77 72 93.5%
2025 62 35 56.5%
2026 47 0 0.0%

1,329 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,580 0.3% 17.8% 49.4% 29.2%
2 599 0.2% 19.9% 56.1% 21.2%
3 203 0.0% 15.8% 63.5% 20.2%
4 82 0.0% 12.2% 64.6% 23.2%
5 36 0.0% 16.7% 55.6% 27.8%
6 13 0.0% 0.0% 84.6% 15.4%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.8%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.7%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.7%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.0%
2024
1.2%
2025
2.1%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.