AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mark Paschall

Appears inactive Last observed office action: March 2021 (61 months ago).

Examiner Mark Paschall appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 86.6%, they average 1.37 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.37
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2008-2021)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3740 - Thermal and Combustion Technology, Motive and Fluid Power Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
1,243
Granted Applications
1,077
Non-Granted Applications
166
Avg OA / Grant
1.37
Last OA Observed
March 2021 (61 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3742 , 3761
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 86.6% 1.37
Art Unit 39 52.8% 2.19
Group 447 58.2% 1.86
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 76 60 78.9%
2009 91 71 78.0%
2010 95 74 77.9%
2011 94 80 85.1%
2012 94 84 89.4%
2013 102 91 89.2%
2014 100 89 89.0%
2015 101 86 85.1%
2016 120 111 92.5%
2017 96 86 89.6%
2018 95 84 88.4%
2019 87 79 90.8%
2020 84 74 88.1%
2021 8 8 100.0%
No observed data after 2021; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

1,077 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 1,242 0.0% 1.8% 82.0% 10.5%
2 324 0.0% 2.2% 83.6% 9.6%
3 108 0.0% 2.8% 86.1% 4.6%
4 36 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 8.3%
5 13 0.0% 0.0% 84.6% 7.7%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%