AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Keith Brian Assante

Examiner Keith Brian Assante appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 51.4%, they average 1.65 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 1.65
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
5 years (2022-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-5853
Predicted Supervisor
Steven W Crabb
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5095
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3760 - Refrigeration, Vaporization, Ventilation, and Combustion

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
146
Granted Applications
75
Non-Granted Applications
71
Avg OA / Grant
1.65
Last OA Observed
February 2026 (1 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3761
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 51.4% 1.65
Art Unit 80 40.8% 2.17
Group 377 50.6% 2.11
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 2 0 0.0%
2023 36 23 63.9%
2024 41 26 63.4%
2025 59 26 44.1%
2026 8 0 0.0%

75 family-cache-validated grants; 1 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 144 0.0% 2.8% 95.1% 0.7%
2 62 0.0% 3.2% 96.8% 0.0%
3 20 5.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.6%
2024
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.