AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Pritesh Patel

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2014 (140 months ago).

Examiner Pritesh Patel appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 64.0%, they average 2.45 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.45
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
7 years (2008-2014)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3760 - Refrigeration, Vaporization, Ventilation, and Combustion

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
225
Granted Applications
144
Non-Granted Applications
81
Avg OA / Grant
2.45
Last OA Observed
July 2014 (140 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3763
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 64.0% 2.45
Art Unit 98 55.4% 2.09
Group 377 50.6% 2.11
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 3 1 33.3%
2009 31 9 29.0%
2010 68 43 63.2%
2011 35 30 85.7%
2012 54 38 70.4%
2013 25 18 72.0%
2014 9 5 55.6%
No observed data after 2014; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

144 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 225 3.6% 7.1% 75.1% 0.9%
2 156 1.3% 3.8% 88.5% 0.0%
3 76 0.0% 3.9% 89.5% 0.0%
4 37 0.0% 5.4% 91.9% 0.0%
5 15 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 0.0%
6 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

0.0%
2008
0.8%
2009
1.3%
2010
3.4%
2011
5.1%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.