AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Abby M Spatz

Appears inactive Last observed office action: June 2025 (9 months ago).

Examiner Abby M Spatz appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 32.6%, they average 2.88 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.88
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2014-2025)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3730 - Sheet Container Making, Package Making, Apparel, and Tool Driving

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
386
Granted Applications
126
Non-Granted Applications
260
Avg OA / Grant
2.88
Last OA Observed
June 2025 (9 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3732 , 3765
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 32.6% 2.88
Art Unit 47 37.9% 2.39
Group 288 51.1% 2.22
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 4 0 0.0%
2015 36 4 11.1%
2016 36 10 27.8%
2017 38 9 23.7%
2018 36 10 27.8%
2019 30 13 43.3%
2020 42 22 52.4%
2021 38 20 52.6%
2022 35 13 37.1%
2023 29 10 34.5%
2024 32 10 31.3%
2025 30 5 16.7%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

126 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 400 0.0% 13.3% 81.8% 4.5%
2 280 0.0% 7.1% 87.9% 5.0%
3 148 0.7% 5.4% 89.2% 4.1%
4 99 0.0% 2.0% 96.0% 2.0%
5 49 0.0% 4.1% 87.8% 8.2%
6 38 0.0% 0.0% 92.1% 7.9%
7 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 4.0%
8 19 0.0% 5.3% 89.5% 5.3%
9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.