AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Jocelyn Bravo

Potentially inactive Last observed office action: November 2025 (5 months ago).

Examiner Jocelyn Bravo appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 46.5%, they average 2.50 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.50
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
12 years (2014-2025)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3730 - Sheet Container Making, Package Making, Apparel, and Tool Driving

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
550
Granted Applications
256
Non-Granted Applications
294
Avg OA / Grant
2.50
Last OA Observed
November 2025 (5 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3732 , 3765
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 46.5% 2.50
Art Unit 47 37.9% 2.39
Group 288 51.1% 2.22
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2014; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2014 2 0 0.0%
2015 34 9 26.5%
2016 39 14 35.9%
2017 43 15 34.9%
2018 40 13 32.5%
2019 41 22 53.7%
2020 49 17 34.7%
2021 54 34 63.0%
2022 55 35 63.6%
2023 59 37 62.7%
2024 65 39 60.0%
2025 69 21 30.4%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

256 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 539 0.0% 4.1% 75.3% 18.7%
2 343 0.0% 2.9% 78.4% 17.5%
3 175 0.0% 2.9% 80.0% 16.6%
4 101 0.0% 1.0% 88.1% 8.9%
5 42 2.4% 2.4% 73.8% 19.0%
6 17 0.0% 0.0% 88.2% 11.8%
7 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.8%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.