AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Rachel O'Connell

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2025 (11 months ago).

Examiner Rachel O'Connell appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 35.2%, they average 3.16 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.16
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
4 years (2022-2025)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3780 - Body Treatment, Kinesitherapy, and Exercising

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
128
Granted Applications
45
Non-Granted Applications
83
Avg OA / Grant
3.16
Last OA Observed
July 2025 (11 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3781
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 35.2% 3.16
Art Unit 56 47.1% 2.06
Group 288 43.4% 1.90
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2022; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2022 27 11 40.7%
2023 26 12 46.2%
2024 22 10 45.5%
2025 53 12 22.6%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

45 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 135 0.7% 5.9% 91.1% 1.5%
2 94 1.1% 5.3% 91.5% 2.1%
3 53 0.0% 3.8% 92.5% 3.8%
4 36 0.0% 2.8% 94.4% 0.0%
5 19 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
6 8 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
7 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
2.2%
2024
2.9%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.