AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Rachel T Smith

Appears inactive Last observed office action: August 2024 (23 months ago).

Examiner Rachel T Smith appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 77.7%, they average 1.74 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.74
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
6 years (2019-2024)
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3780 - Body Treatment, Kinesitherapy, and Exercising

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
197
Granted Applications
153
Non-Granted Applications
44
Avg OA / Grant
1.74
Last OA Observed
August 2024 (23 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3783
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 77.7% 1.74
Art Unit 80 46.0% 1.98
Group 295 42.1% 1.90
Tech Center 2,662 48.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,347 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2019; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2019 4 3 75.0%
2020 41 29 70.7%
2021 42 33 78.6%
2022 46 40 87.0%
2023 39 31 79.5%
2024 25 17 68.0%
No observed data after 2024; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

153 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 209 0.0% 6.2% 57.9% 25.8%
2 90 0.0% 10.0% 73.3% 12.2%
3 36 0.0% 2.8% 80.6% 5.6%
4 19 0.0% 0.0% 78.9% 5.3%
5 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
6 4 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2019
1.1%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.