AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Nadia Ahmad Mahmood

Examiner Nadia Ahmad Mahmood appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.2%, they average 1.50 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.50
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
16 years (2011-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-3975
Predicted Supervisor
David Hamaoui
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5625
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3790 - Medical Instruments, Diagnostic Equipment, and Treatment Devices

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
918
Granted Applications
773
Non-Granted Applications
145
Avg OA / Grant
1.50
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3762 , 3792 , 3796
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.2% 1.50
Art Unit 59 59.3% 1.97
Group 327 40.3% 2.25
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2011; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2011 6 1 16.7%
2012 45 25 55.6%
2013 66 57 86.4%
2014 54 45 83.3%
2015 44 39 88.6%
2016 56 48 85.7%
2017 72 68 94.4%
2018 90 89 98.9%
2019 56 53 94.6%
2020 76 71 93.4%
2021 53 50 94.3%
2022 64 60 93.8%
2023 56 54 96.4%
2024 78 75 96.2%
2025 82 38 46.3%
2026 20 0 0.0%

773 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 936 3.1% 31.0% 39.3% 1.1%
2 276 2.5% 14.1% 75.7% 2.5%
3 103 0.0% 9.7% 86.4% 1.0%
4 51 2.0% 5.9% 88.2% 2.0%
5 17 5.9% 11.8% 76.5% 0.0%
6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
1.8%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
1.1%
2015
2.0%
2016
1.0%
2017
6.3%
2018
7.9%
2019
5.0%
2020
7.1%
2021
4.1%
2022
2.6%
2023
2.3%
2024
4.8%
2025
5.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.