AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Bobby Yeonjin Kim

Examiner Bobby Yeonjin Kim appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 66.5%, they average 1.72 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.72
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1866
Predicted Supervisor
Adam Eiseman
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-3818
Tech Center
3700 - Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing and Products
Group
3720 - Manufacturing Devices and Processes, Machine Tools and Hand Tools

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
409
Granted Applications
272
Non-Granted Applications
137
Avg OA / Grant
1.72
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
3725
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 66.5% 1.72
Art Unit 56 54.1% 1.72
Group 306 53.9% 1.76
Tech Center 2,632 49.9% 2.01
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 12 3 25.0%
2019 61 41 67.2%
2020 60 45 75.0%
2021 61 45 73.8%
2022 57 48 84.2%
2023 46 39 84.8%
2024 40 30 75.0%
2025 56 21 37.5%
2026 16 0 0.0%

272 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 394 0.5% 18.0% 58.9% 20.3%
2 170 0.0% 15.3% 67.1% 15.9%
3 64 0.0% 10.9% 75.0% 14.1%
4 31 0.0% 6.5% 77.4% 12.9%
5 8 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 37.5%
6 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
2.8%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.