Examiner Peter Anthopolos

Grant ratio: 49.6% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 1611 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 49.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.75
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87067
Primary art unit
1611
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
557
Granted applications
276
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5989
Supervisor
Daniel Sullivan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0614

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 23.1% 2.51
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.31 1,286 office actions across 557 applications
Applications with office actions 95.2% 530 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 27 4.8%
1 OA 177 31.8%
2 OAs 183 32.9%
3 OAs 62 11.1%
4 OAs 54 9.7%
5+ OAs 54 9.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 18.2% 2010 2011: 31.3% 2011 2012: 42.2% 2012 2013: 31.4% 2013 2014: 53.3% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 51.4% 2017 2018: 43.5% 2018 2019: 64.9% 2019 2020: 84.0% 2020 2021: 71.0% 2021 2022: 71.4% 2022 2023: 69.0% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 23.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011218.2%
2011321031.3%
2012451942.2%
2013351131.4%
2014452453.3%
2015302066.7%
2016281450.0%
2017371951.4%
2018231043.5%
2019372464.9%
2020252184.0%
2021312271.0%
2022282071.4%
2023422969.0%
2024332266.7%
202538923.7%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 530 0.8% 7.2% 59.1% 0.9%
Action 2 353 0.6% 5.7% 68.0% 3.4%
Action 3 170 1.2% 5.9% 65.9% 5.9%
Action 4 108 0.0% 2.8% 64.8% 13.0%
Action 5 54 0.0% 0.0% 70.4% 9.3%
Action 6 33 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 3.0%
Action 7 17 0.0% 5.9% 52.9% 5.9%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.5% 5 of 204 office actions
All years 0.6% 8 of 1,286 office actions
Change +1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2024: AI examples
4.7%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 11, 2021 13/000,241 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 15, 2017 12/211,030 Reversed §103
Dec. 19, 2016 12/459,452 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 23, 2016 11/316,570 Affirmed §103
Aug. 28, 2015 12/628,371 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 23, 2013 12/214,425 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.