Examiner Lisbeth C. Robinson

Grant ratio: 30.9% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1611 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2017
Grant ratio 30.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87627
Primary art unit
1611
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
223
Granted applications
69

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 23.1% 2.51
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.65 852 office actions across 321 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 321 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 82 25.5%
2 OAs 110 34.3%
3 OAs 42 13.1%
4 OAs 43 13.4%
5+ OAs 44 13.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 22.0% 2012 2013: 28.6% 2013 2014: 34.1% 2014 2015: 25.0% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20111400.0%
201241922.0%
2013421228.6%
2014441534.1%
201532825.0%
2016241250.0%
2017261350.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 321 0.9% 5.0% 50.2% 13.1%
Action 2 239 0.0% 5.0% 64.9% 6.3%
Action 3 129 0.0% 3.9% 62.0% 7.0%
Action 4 87 0.0% 3.4% 57.5% 8.0%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 47.7% 6.8%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 5.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 852 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 11 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
7.7% 1/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
15.4% 2/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 22, 2019 13/603,984 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 27, 2017 13/701,210 Affirmed §103
Dec. 21, 2017 13/795,663 Affirmed §103
Mar. 20, 2017 12/633,631 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 6, 2016 12/983,344 Affirmed §103
Sep. 14, 2016 12/864,301 Affirmed §103
Jul. 26, 2016 12/598,138 Reversed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 12/824,311 Affirmed §103
Mar. 14, 2016 11/624,985 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 29, 2016 12/620,410 Affirmed §103
Jan. 12, 2016 12/624,980 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 8, 2014 12/439,828 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.