Examiner Amanda Michelle Petritsch

Grant ratio: 31.4% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 1612 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 31.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.82
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
96509
Primary art unit
1612
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
159
Granted applications
50
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6812
Supervisor
Frederick Krass
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0580

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 33 31.9% 2.35
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.72 433 office actions across 159 applications
Applications with office actions 93.7% 149 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 6.3%
1 OA 46 28.9%
2 OAs 30 18.9%
3 OAs 18 11.3%
4 OAs 31 19.5%
5+ OAs 24 15.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 46.7% 2022 2023: 63.6% 2023 2024: 46.7% 2024 2025: 22.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
202166100.0%
202215746.7%
2023221463.6%
2024301446.7%
202540922.5%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 149 0.0% 0.0% 47.0% 1.3%
Action 2 103 0.0% 0.0% 55.3% 0.0%
Action 3 73 0.0% 0.0% 54.8% 0.0%
Action 4 55 0.0% 0.0% 56.4% 0.0%
Action 5 24 0.0% 0.0% 41.7% 0.0%
Action 6 18 0.0% 0.0% 27.8% 5.6%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 285 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 433 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
7.4 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 11, 2026 17/740,486 Reversed New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 17, 2026 17/308,078 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 25, 2026 17/727,435 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jun. 10, 2026 17/704,027 Affirmed §103
Apr. 30, 2026 17/583,562 Affirmed §103
Apr. 28, 2026 17/826,961 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 23, 2026 17/723,953 Affirmed §103
Oct. 22, 2025 16/771,805 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.