Examiner Bethany Barham

Grant ratio: 51.3% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 1615 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 51.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82937
Primary art unit
1615
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
487
Granted applications
250
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6175

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 37.9% 2.33
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.93 938 office actions across 487 applications
Applications with office actions 95.1% 463 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 24 4.9%
1 OA 201 41.3%
2 OAs 141 29.0%
3 OAs 68 14.0%
4 OAs 35 7.2%
5+ OAs 18 3.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 30.8% 2008 2009: 40.9% 2009 2010: 46.5% 2010 2011: 58.0% 2011 2012: 73.0% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 88.2% 2014 2017: 30.8% 2017 2018: 14.3% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008521630.8%
2009662740.9%
2010864046.5%
2011694058.0%
2012745473.0%
2013655280.0%
2014171588.2%
201713430.8%
201814214.3%
2020500.0%
2021400.0%
2025900.0%
20261300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 463 0.4% 10.8% 81.2% 2.6%
Action 2 262 0.4% 8.8% 79.4% 5.0%
Action 3 121 0.0% 8.3% 81.8% 5.0%
Action 4 53 0.0% 7.5% 83.0% 1.9%
Action 5 18 0.0% 11.1% 83.3% 5.6%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 16.7%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 30 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 938 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 14, 2019 14/502,251 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Sep. 11, 2015 11/912,085 Reversed N/A
Nov. 30, 2012 11/900,779 Affirmed §103
Feb. 24, 2012 11/108,352 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 13, 2012 11/037,977 Reversed §103
Mar. 3, 2011 11/084,967 Affirmed §103
Mar. 3, 2011 10/949,129 Affirmed §102 · §103
Apr. 12, 2010 09/842,466 Granted-In-Part §103
Mar. 22, 2010 10/725,159 Affirmed §103
Dec. 23, 2009 10/965,584 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.