Examiner James H. Alstrum-Acevedo

Grant ratio: 41.2% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 1616 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: April 2026
Grant ratio 41.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.40
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81159
Primary art unit
1616
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
427
Granted applications
176

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 28.5% 2.46
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.03 889 office actions across 437 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 437 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 205 46.9%
2 OAs 117 26.8%
3 OAs 61 14.0%
4 OAs 28 6.4%
5+ OAs 26 5.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.9% 2008 2009: 27.3% 2009 2010: 37.0% 2010 2011: 50.6% 2011 2012: 56.1% 2012 2013: 60.0% 2013 2015: 0.0% 2015 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 0.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008581525.9%
2009661827.3%
2010813037.0%
2011854350.6%
2012824656.1%
2013352160.0%
2015100.0%
20174375.0%
2018100.0%
2020500.0%
2021100.0%
2024100.0%
2025300.0%
2026400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 437 0.2% 4.6% 41.6% 5.5%
Action 2 232 0.0% 3.0% 45.7% 8.6%
Action 3 115 0.0% 2.6% 45.2% 7.0%
Action 4 54 0.0% 3.7% 48.1% 7.4%
Action 5 26 0.0% 0.0% 46.2% 3.8%
Action 6 16 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 12.5%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 21 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 889 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 14 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
10.5% 2/19 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
26.3% 5/19 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 20, 2016 10/933,723 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 20, 2016 10/443,593 Affirmed §103
Jun. 20, 2016 11/675,450 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 17, 2016 11/740,809 Affirmed §103
Jun. 17, 2016 11/740,790 Affirmed §103
Jun. 17, 2016 11/675,439 Affirmed §103
Jun. 17, 2016 11/959,134 Affirmed §103
Jun. 16, 2016 11/740,823 Affirmed §103
May. 18, 2016 11/838,468 Affirmed §103
Oct. 15, 2015 11/496,030 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 11, 2013 10/519,008 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2012 10/559,383 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.