Examiner Jessica Kassa

Grant ratio: 36.3% (50th percentile in Art Unit 1616 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.54. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2018
Grant ratio 36.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.54
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86832
Primary art unit
1616
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
281
Granted applications
102

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 28.5% 2.46
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.53 820 office actions across 324 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 324 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 116 35.8%
2 OAs 79 24.4%
3 OAs 54 16.7%
4 OAs 44 13.6%
5+ OAs 31 9.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 34.5% 2010 2011: 34.0% 2011 2012: 46.4% 2012 2013: 41.9% 2013 2014: 34.5% 2014 2015: 46.9% 2015 2016: 29.6% 2016 2017: 18.5% 2017 2018: 43.8% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009300.0%
2010291034.5%
2011471634.0%
2012281346.4%
2013431841.9%
2014291034.5%
2015321546.9%
201627829.6%
201727518.5%
201816743.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 324 0.6% 4.3% 67.0% 1.5%
Action 2 208 0.0% 6.7% 68.8% 2.4%
Action 3 129 0.0% 8.5% 62.0% 9.3%
Action 4 75 0.0% 8.0% 66.7% 9.3%
Action 5 31 0.0% 12.9% 71.0% 3.2%
Action 6 21 0.0% 9.5% 71.4% 4.8%
Action 7 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 2 of 820 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
23.5% 4/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
23.5% 4/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 24, 2020 14/141,946 Affirmed §103
Jul. 14, 2020 14/674,536 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 10, 2019 14/044,546 Reversed §103
Sep. 6, 2019 14/109,976 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 21, 2018 12/624,236 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 16, 2017 13/835,237 Reversed §103
Jun. 9, 2017 12/250,624 Reversed §103
Jan. 27, 2017 13/075,116 Affirmed §103
Nov. 2, 2016 12/515,165 Affirmed §103
Aug. 12, 2016 12/281,116 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jul. 26, 2016 13/546,594 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jun. 30, 2016 11/547,214 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.