Examiner Daniel L. Branson

Grant ratio: 43.9% (80th percentile in Art Unit 1616 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2021
Grant ratio 43.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.93
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88091
Primary art unit
1616
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
431
Granted applications
189

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 28.5% 2.46
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.76 1,237 office actions across 449 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 449 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 125 27.8%
2 OAs 136 30.3%
3 OAs 59 13.1%
4 OAs 64 14.3%
5+ OAs 65 14.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 35.0% 2011 2012: 39.0% 2012 2013: 32.1% 2013 2014: 53.7% 2014 2015: 48.7% 2015 2016: 55.3% 2016 2017: 27.6% 2017 2018: 52.9% 2018 2019: 34.8% 2019 2020: 47.4% 2020 2021: 52.2% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201120735.0%
2012411639.0%
2013561832.1%
2014412253.7%
2015391948.7%
2016472655.3%
201729827.6%
2018512752.9%
2019461634.8%
2020381847.4%
2021231252.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 449 0.2% 2.7% 61.7% 0.9%
Action 2 324 0.3% 2.2% 70.4% 1.2%
Action 3 188 0.0% 1.6% 70.2% 3.7%
Action 4 129 0.8% 0.0% 64.3% 7.0%
Action 5 65 0.0% 0.0% 72.3% 3.1%
Action 6 41 0.0% 0.0% 73.2% 2.4%
Action 7 19 0.0% 0.0% 68.4% 5.3%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,237 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 15 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
15.8% 3/19 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
21.1% 4/19 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 24, 2022 14/395,396 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 14, 2022 15/758,828 Reversed §103
Jan. 12, 2022 15/327,671 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 19, 2020 13/114,617 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Feb. 14, 2019 12/726,326 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jun. 8, 2018 13/881,516 Affirmed §103
May. 14, 2018 14/119,931 Affirmed §103
May. 4, 2018 14/072,466 Affirmed §103
Jan. 22, 2018 13/792,926 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2017 13/113,174 Reversed §103
Aug. 25, 2017 13/925,316 Reversed §103
Jun. 7, 2017 13/899,014 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.