Examiner Carlos A Azpuru

Grant ratio: 80.0% (97th percentile in Art Unit 1617 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.60. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.60
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
66935
Primary art unit
1617
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,305
Granted applications
1,044
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0588
Supervisor
Sue X Liu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5539

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 43.1% 2.30
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.59 2,073 office actions across 1,305 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 1,296 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 0.7%
1 OA 789 60.5%
2 OAs 343 26.3%
3 OAs 103 7.9%
4 OAs 36 2.8%
5+ OAs 25 1.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.3% 2008 2009: 66.3% 2009 2010: 76.5% 2010 2011: 80.9% 2011 2012: 80.5% 2012 2013: 83.0% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 90.5% 2015 2016: 89.2% 2016 2017: 86.3% 2017 2018: 93.8% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 86.1% 2020 2021: 90.8% 2021 2022: 98.1% 2022 2023: 85.3% 2023 2024: 86.3% 2024 2025: 65.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291448.3%
20091016766.3%
2010816276.5%
2011685580.9%
2012776280.5%
2013947883.0%
2014665481.8%
2015635790.5%
2016837489.2%
2017736386.3%
2018656193.8%
2019786583.3%
2020726286.1%
2021655990.8%
2022525198.1%
2023685885.3%
2024736386.3%
2025603965.0%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,296 2.0% 23.0% 31.6% 14.5%
Action 2 507 3.2% 15.0% 28.6% 32.1%
Action 3 164 0.6% 17.1% 29.9% 31.7%
Action 4 61 0.0% 18.0% 29.5% 36.1%
Action 5 25 0.0% 4.0% 36.0% 48.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 7.1% 50.0% 28.6%
Action 7 5 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 256 office actions
All years 2.1% 43 of 2,073 office actions
Change -1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.2%
5.0%
2.0%
5.3%
3.0%
1.5%
2014: Alice
2.4%
0.0%
4.8%
2.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.9%
1.2%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2020 15/337,410 Affirmed §102 · §112
Mar. 6, 2015 12/102,342 Reversed §102
Jan. 14, 2013 12/314,992 Affirmed §102
Dec. 20, 2011 10/526,755 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 15, 2011 10/611,076 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 22, 2011 11/090,806 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.