Examiner Nabila Ebrahim

Grant ratio: 36.8% (38th percentile in Art Unit 1618 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2020
Grant ratio 36.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81063
Primary art unit
1618
Work group
1610
Technology center
1600
Applications
351
Granted applications
129

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 35.3% 2.44
Group 217 31.1% 2.42
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.61 936 office actions across 358 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 358 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 118 33.0%
2 OAs 90 25.1%
3 OAs 60 16.8%
4 OAs 46 12.8%
5+ OAs 44 12.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 8.7% 2008 2009: 18.2% 2009 2010: 30.6% 2010 2011: 40.5% 2011 2012: 38.7% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 18.8% 2014 2015: 37.1% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 36.7% 2017 2018: 29.4% 2018 2019: 34.6% 2019 2020: 52.2% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20082328.7%
200922418.2%
2010361130.6%
2011421740.5%
2012311238.7%
2013302066.7%
201416318.8%
2015351337.1%
2016201050.0%
2017301136.7%
201817529.4%
201926934.6%
2020231252.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 358 0.8% 2.5% 77.4% 0.8%
Action 2 240 1.3% 4.6% 84.6% 0.4%
Action 3 150 0.0% 3.3% 86.7% 2.0%
Action 4 90 0.0% 5.6% 91.1% 0.0%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 86.4% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 3.7% 92.6% 0.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 7.1% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.6% 6 of 936 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 16. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
26.7% 4/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 5/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 27, 2022 15/845,608 Affirmed §103
Dec. 7, 2021 13/675,306 Reversed §103
Jul. 26, 2021 12/478,794 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Feb. 12, 2021 12/910,508 Affirmed §103
Feb. 3, 2020 12/509,831 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 24, 2020 15/001,302 Affirmed §103
Apr. 30, 2019 13/804,781 Rehearing Decision-Granted §103
Nov. 16, 2017 13/320,138 Affirmed §103
Apr. 4, 2016 12/971,368 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2016 11/639,408 Reversed N/A
Aug. 28, 2015 11/499,044 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jul. 10, 2015 12/705,888 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.