Examiner Angela Brown-Pettigrew

Grant ratio: 48.4% (55th percentile in Art Unit 1621 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.17. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 48.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.17
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90089
Primary art unit
1621
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
353
Granted applications
171
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2817
Supervisor
Ardin Marschel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2817

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 44.8% 1.73
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.37 920 office actions across 388 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 388 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 152 39.2%
2 OAs 103 26.5%
3 OAs 55 14.2%
4 OAs 36 9.3%
5+ OAs 42 10.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 51.2% 2013 2014: 42.2% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 49.0% 2016 2017: 58.6% 2017 2018: 51.1% 2018 2019: 42.9% 2019 2020: 64.3% 2020 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 33.3% 2023 2025: 11.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013412151.2%
2014451942.2%
2015402050.0%
2016492449.0%
2017583458.6%
2018452351.1%
2019421842.9%
202014964.3%
202211100.0%
20233133.3%
20259111.1%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 388 2.3% 9.0% 56.2% 10.1%
Action 2 236 0.4% 7.6% 69.9% 10.6%
Action 3 133 0.0% 6.0% 75.9% 7.5%
Action 4 78 1.3% 9.0% 75.6% 7.7%
Action 5 42 4.8% 9.5% 66.7% 11.9%
Action 6 22 9.1% 9.1% 50.0% 13.6%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 23 office actions
All years 1.6% 15 of 920 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
2.3%
0.9%
4.3%
0.7%
3.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 16, 2021 14/175,154 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 1, 2020 15/478,437 Affirmed §102
Jun. 15, 2020 15/279,939 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Mar. 14, 2019 14/282,888 Affirmed §103
Jan. 5, 2017 13/677,738 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.