Examiner Celia Chang, Ph. D

Grant ratio: 60.5% (35th percentile in Art Unit 1625 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.74. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2017
Grant ratio 60.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.74
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
68172
Primary art unit
1625
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
836
Granted applications
506

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.7% 1.54
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.69 1,414 office actions across 836 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 836 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 449 53.7%
2 OAs 265 31.7%
3 OAs 80 9.6%
4 OAs 25 3.0%
5+ OAs 17 2.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 54.5% 2008 2009: 65.0% 2009 2010: 56.5% 2010 2011: 48.7% 2011 2012: 61.2% 2012 2013: 58.4% 2013 2014: 64.0% 2014 2015: 67.1% 2015 2016: 76.4% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008774254.5%
20091207865.0%
2010925256.5%
20111175748.7%
20121167161.2%
20131015958.4%
2014754864.0%
2015795367.1%
2016554276.4%
201744100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 836 0.5% 8.1% 35.2% 19.0%
Action 2 387 1.6% 8.8% 43.4% 23.3%
Action 3 122 0.0% 9.8% 41.8% 19.7%
Action 4 42 0.0% 14.3% 42.9% 21.4%
Action 5 17 0.0% 0.0% 35.3% 23.5%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 10 of 1,414 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.6%
1.3%
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 3/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 18, 2014 11/572,949 Reversed §103 · §112
Oct. 31, 2012 11/539,932 Reversed §112
Apr. 30, 2012 10/510,064 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.