Examiner Charanjit Aulakh

Grant ratio: 75.9% (75th percentile in Art Unit 1625 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.46. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.46
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74143
Primary art unit
1625
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,827
Granted applications
1,386
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0678
Supervisor
Clinton A Brooks
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7682

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.7% 1.54
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.46 2,667 office actions across 1,827 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,822 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.3%
1 OA 1,229 67.3%
2 OAs 452 24.7%
3 OAs 71 3.9%
4 OAs 45 2.5%
5+ OAs 25 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 69.4% 2008 2009: 75.9% 2009 2010: 81.4% 2010 2011: 78.6% 2011 2012: 84.4% 2012 2013: 83.9% 2013 2014: 84.4% 2014 2015: 81.6% 2015 2016: 73.0% 2016 2017: 84.3% 2017 2018: 89.8% 2018 2019: 82.6% 2019 2020: 89.1% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 71.3% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 36.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008855969.4%
200913310175.9%
2010977981.4%
20111038178.6%
20121099284.4%
2013877383.9%
2014968184.4%
2015877181.6%
20161118173.0%
2017837084.3%
2018988889.8%
2019927682.6%
20201109889.1%
2021908190.0%
2022887585.2%
20231017271.3%
2024957680.0%
2025873236.8%
20267500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,822 2.9% 21.1% 18.2% 19.7%
Action 2 593 0.5% 18.9% 15.9% 41.8%
Action 3 141 0.7% 19.9% 22.7% 34.0%
Action 4 70 1.4% 14.3% 12.9% 50.0%
Action 5 25 0.0% 16.0% 8.0% 48.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 8.3% 8.3% 66.7%
Action 7 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 2 of 398 office actions
All years 2.1% 57 of 2,667 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.3%
3.5%
3.0%
4.5%
6.3%
4.8%
2014: Alice
2.0%
1.6%
1.1%
3.0%
1.3%
2019: PEG
1.4%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
6.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 25, 2021 16/988,200 Affirmed §102
May. 30, 2019 14/810,617 Affirmed §103
Oct. 25, 2013 11/760,039 Reversed §112
Aug. 23, 2010 11/582,846 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.