Examiner Nizal S Chandrakumar

Grant ratio: 66.6% (48th percentile in Art Unit 1625 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.70. Most common rejection type: §112.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.70
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82948
Primary art unit
1625
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,883
Granted applications
1,254
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6202
Supervisor
Andrew Kosar
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0913

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.7% 1.54
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 3,225 office actions across 1,883 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,881 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.1%
1 OA 1,004 53.3%
2 OAs 590 31.3%
3 OAs 169 9.0%
4 OAs 75 4.0%
5+ OAs 43 2.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 70.6% 2008 2009: 70.8% 2009 2010: 51.7% 2010 2011: 68.8% 2011 2012: 79.3% 2012 2013: 78.2% 2013 2014: 85.0% 2014 2015: 78.2% 2015 2016: 70.8% 2016 2017: 69.7% 2017 2018: 72.5% 2018 2019: 69.8% 2019 2020: 73.0% 2020 2021: 82.0% 2021 2022: 76.6% 2022 2023: 60.7% 2023 2024: 64.8% 2024 2025: 35.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081268970.6%
20091138070.8%
20101186151.7%
20111097568.8%
201214011179.3%
20131199378.2%
20141008585.0%
20151108678.2%
2016966870.8%
2017664669.7%
20181097972.5%
2019966769.8%
20201007373.0%
2021897382.0%
2022775976.6%
2023563460.7%
2024714664.8%
2025822935.4%
202610600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,881 2.2% 6.2% 32.5% 38.0%
Action 2 877 0.5% 6.6% 31.7% 37.7%
Action 3 287 1.0% 7.7% 32.1% 38.7%
Action 4 118 2.5% 9.3% 33.9% 33.1%
Action 5 43 2.3% 7.0% 41.9% 25.6%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 36.4% 18.2%
Action 7 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 50.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 5 of 468 office actions
All years 1.6% 52 of 3,225 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.5%
0.6%
1.4%
1.1%
1.3%
2.5%
2014: Alice
3.6%
2.5%
3.9%
2.5%
2.0%
2019: PEG
1.1%
1.6%
1.4%
0.8%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
1.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 13, 2023 15/663,312 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Aug. 8, 2016 13/591,431 Reversed §103
Apr. 6, 2016 12/513,093 Affirmed §112
Apr. 12, 2013 11/139,338 Affirmed §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.