Examiner Kamal A Saeed

Grant ratio: 81.0% (95th percentile in Art Unit 1626 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.20.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 81.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.20
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78538
Primary art unit
1626
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,209
Granted applications
979
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0705
Supervisor
Adam C Milligan
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7674

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 56.4% 1.65
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.20 1,445 office actions across 1,209 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,207 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 1,016 84.0%
2 OAs 162 13.4%
3 OAs 16 1.3%
4 OAs 9 0.7%
5+ OAs 4 0.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 83.6% 2008 2009: 80.0% 2009 2010: 71.8% 2010 2011: 80.0% 2011 2012: 79.3% 2012 2013: 89.2% 2013 2014: 91.7% 2014 2015: 86.0% 2015 2016: 77.0% 2016 2017: 84.5% 2017 2018: 84.2% 2018 2019: 84.7% 2019 2020: 93.5% 2020 2021: 89.2% 2021 2022: 87.2% 2022 2023: 91.5% 2023 2024: 82.1% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008615183.6%
2009705680.0%
2010715171.8%
2011806480.0%
2012584679.3%
2013837489.2%
2014726691.7%
2015574986.0%
2016614777.0%
2017716084.5%
2018574884.2%
2019595084.7%
2020625893.5%
2021655889.2%
2022786887.2%
2023716591.5%
2024675582.1%
2025391333.3%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,207 0.3% 1.2% 2.8% 2.0%
Action 2 191 0.5% 3.1% 6.3% 6.8%
Action 3 29 0.0% 3.4% 13.8% 6.9%
Action 4 13 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% 23.1%
Action 5 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 1 of 168 office actions
All years 0.3% 5 of 1,445 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.3%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 22, 2011 11/169,773 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.