Examiner Sun Jae Yoo

Grant ratio: 65.5% (45th percentile in Art Unit 1626 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.23.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.23
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83499
Primary art unit
1626
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,302
Granted applications
853
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9074
Supervisor
Joseph Mckane
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0699

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 56.4% 1.65
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.18 2,833 office actions across 1,302 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,297 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.4%
1 OA 546 41.9%
2 OAs 380 29.2%
3 OAs 163 12.5%
4 OAs 108 8.3%
5+ OAs 100 7.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 37.5% 2008 2009: 63.0% 2009 2010: 53.6% 2010 2011: 68.0% 2011 2012: 71.0% 2012 2013: 68.7% 2013 2014: 78.1% 2014 2015: 68.3% 2015 2016: 79.3% 2016 2017: 63.2% 2017 2018: 84.6% 2018 2019: 72.5% 2019 2020: 74.5% 2020 2021: 86.0% 2021 2022: 86.2% 2022 2023: 87.1% 2023 2024: 78.6% 2024 2025: 32.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008642437.5%
2009734663.0%
2010975253.6%
20111228368.0%
2012624471.0%
2013835768.7%
2014645078.1%
2015604168.3%
2016826579.3%
2017684363.2%
2018655584.6%
2019513772.5%
2020513874.5%
2021574986.0%
2022655686.2%
2023625487.1%
2024564478.6%
2025461532.6%
20267400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,297 0.8% 26.4% 15.9% 20.0%
Action 2 751 0.4% 19.4% 14.0% 22.4%
Action 3 371 0.5% 19.7% 20.2% 16.7%
Action 4 208 0.5% 20.7% 19.7% 19.2%
Action 5 100 0.0% 18.0% 21.0% 23.0%
Action 6 54 0.0% 18.5% 20.4% 22.2%
Action 7 25 0.0% 24.0% 16.0% 20.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 28.6% 21.4% 14.3%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 33.3% 33.3%
Action 10 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 285 office actions
All years 0.6% 16 of 2,833 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.5%
0.5%
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
0.6%
2014: Alice
0.7%
1.3%
1.4%
1.2%
0.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 25, 2019 14/002,809 Reversed §103
Sep. 29, 2011 10/555,286 Reversed §103
Aug. 10, 2011 10/594,966 Reversed §103
May. 2, 2011 10/534,156 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Jan. 31, 2011 11/835,462 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.