Examiner Jennifer M. Kim

Grant ratio: 46.1% (56th percentile in Art Unit 1628 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.96. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2020
Grant ratio 46.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.96
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77469
Primary art unit
1628
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
703
Granted applications
324

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 39.2% 1.96
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.00 1,460 office actions across 731 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 731 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 340 46.5%
2 OAs 220 30.1%
3 OAs 76 10.4%
4 OAs 54 7.4%
5+ OAs 41 5.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 24.1% 2008 2009: 32.8% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 44.2% 2011 2012: 47.4% 2012 2013: 47.9% 2013 2014: 46.9% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 50.8% 2016 2017: 61.3% 2017 2018: 69.2% 2018 2019: 67.7% 2019 2020: 45.5% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008791924.1%
2009672232.8%
2010663350.0%
2011773444.2%
2012572747.4%
2013713447.9%
2014643046.9%
2015582950.0%
2016653350.8%
2017311961.3%
2018261869.2%
2019312167.7%
202011545.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 731 0.3% 10.7% 74.7% 4.5%
Action 2 391 0.0% 6.4% 81.8% 3.8%
Action 3 171 0.0% 7.0% 84.8% 2.3%
Action 4 95 0.0% 6.3% 84.2% 3.2%
Action 5 41 0.0% 14.6% 78.0% 0.0%
Action 6 18 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 5.6%
Action 7 7 0.0% 14.3% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,460 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 14 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
15.8% 3/19 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
26.3% 5/19 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 3, 2018 15/047,960 Affirmed §103
Apr. 25, 2018 11/909,740 Affirmed §103
Mar. 30, 2018 14/732,013 Reversed §103
Dec. 14, 2017 13/062,388 Affirmed §103
Oct. 30, 2017 13/114,687 Affirmed §103
Mar. 29, 2017 12/738,729 Affirmed §103
Feb. 27, 2017 13/328,369 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 25, 2017 12/958,879 Affirmed §103
Jul. 28, 2016 12/306,552 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 26, 2016 13/041,279 Affirmed §103
Apr. 5, 2016 13/207,274 Affirmed §103
Apr. 4, 2016 13/302,769 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.