Examiner Janet L Coppins

Grant ratio: 67.2% (94th percentile in Art Unit 1628 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.62
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79310
Primary art unit
1628
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
1,000
Granted applications
672
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0680
Supervisor
Amy L Clark
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1310

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 39.2% 1.96
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.74 1,742 office actions across 1,000 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 997 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 576 57.6%
2 OAs 252 25.2%
3 OAs 91 9.1%
4 OAs 42 4.2%
5+ OAs 36 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 77.5% 2008 2009: 63.9% 2009 2010: 60.0% 2010 2011: 82.4% 2011 2012: 87.3% 2012 2013: 73.8% 2013 2014: 93.2% 2014 2015: 77.9% 2015 2016: 91.4% 2016 2017: 83.6% 2017 2018: 67.6% 2018 2019: 68.2% 2019 2020: 61.2% 2020 2021: 73.2% 2021 2022: 52.8% 2022 2023: 65.2% 2023 2024: 57.9% 2024 2025: 12.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008403177.5%
2009613963.9%
2010201260.0%
2011514282.4%
2012635587.3%
2013614573.8%
2014736893.2%
2015685377.9%
2016706491.4%
2017554683.6%
2018372567.6%
2019664568.2%
2020493061.2%
2021564173.2%
2022361952.8%
2023463065.2%
2024382257.9%
202539512.8%
20267100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 997 2.5% 19.1% 32.7% 24.0%
Action 2 421 2.4% 13.5% 47.7% 23.0%
Action 3 169 0.0% 6.5% 61.5% 21.9%
Action 4 78 1.3% 2.6% 69.2% 20.5%
Action 5 36 2.8% 5.6% 61.1% 22.2%
Action 6 18 5.6% 5.6% 77.8% 5.6%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 62.5% 12.5%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 325 office actions
All years 2.2% 38 of 1,742 office actions
Change -2.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.5%
5.5%
6.9%
8.6%
6.2%
3.2%
2014: Alice
2.1%
0.0%
4.2%
6.7%
2.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 16, 2026 18/353,850 Affirmed §103
Jul. 15, 2025 16/499,230 Reversed §103
Jun. 25, 2024 15/950,246 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §120
Jul. 27, 2022 15/318,518 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.