Examiner Christopher R. Stone

Grant ratio: 36.9% (35th percentile in Art Unit 1628 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.18. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2019
Grant ratio 36.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.18
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84151
Primary art unit
1628
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
590
Granted applications
218

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 39.2% 1.96
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.23 1,467 office actions across 658 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 658 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 255 38.8%
2 OAs 210 31.9%
3 OAs 87 13.2%
4 OAs 56 8.5%
5+ OAs 50 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 2.6% 2008 2009: 13.6% 2009 2010: 25.3% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 48.8% 2012 2013: 37.3% 2013 2014: 51.7% 2014 2015: 43.1% 2015 2016: 42.0% 2016 2017: 34.5% 2017 2018: 57.1% 2018 2019: 28.6% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007300.0%
20083912.6%
200944613.6%
2010751925.3%
2011663350.0%
2012432148.8%
2013592237.3%
2014603151.7%
2015512243.1%
2016502142.0%
2017582034.5%
2018352057.1%
20197228.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 658 0.9% 15.5% 56.5% 8.4%
Action 2 403 0.0% 13.4% 65.8% 9.7%
Action 3 193 0.0% 10.4% 67.4% 11.4%
Action 4 106 0.0% 8.5% 71.7% 9.4%
Action 5 50 0.0% 12.0% 70.0% 8.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 9.7% 64.5% 12.9%
Action 7 12 0.0% 8.3% 50.0% 8.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,467 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
0.0%
0.7%
1.4%
1.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 18. Merits outcomes: 14 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.8% 2/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
17.6% 3/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 4, 2020 13/900,166 Reversed §103
Sep. 12, 2019 12/661,964 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 17, 2019 15/279,265 Affirmed §103
Apr. 3, 2019 14/125,185 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Aug. 23, 2016 13/092,199 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 1, 2015 12/374,279 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection N/A
Jul. 29, 2015 12/843,364 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 24, 2014 11/178,309 Reversed §103
Feb. 6, 2013 11/570,887 Affirmed §103
Sep. 6, 2012 11/402,961 Affirmed §103
Nov. 21, 2011 12/351,942 Affirmed §103
Nov. 15, 2011 10/556,474 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.