Examiner George W Kosturko

Grant ratio: 47.7% (60th percentile in Art Unit 1628 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 47.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88625
Primary art unit
1628
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
763
Granted applications
364
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5903
Supervisor
Clinton A Brooks
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7682

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 39.2% 1.96
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.10 1,601 office actions across 763 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 760 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 329 43.1%
2 OAs 224 29.4%
3 OAs 99 13.0%
4 OAs 64 8.4%
5+ OAs 44 5.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 45.5% 2012 2013: 52.8% 2013 2014: 54.2% 2014 2015: 44.9% 2015 2016: 42.5% 2016 2017: 42.6% 2017 2018: 46.0% 2018 2019: 50.9% 2019 2020: 50.0% 2020 2021: 64.2% 2021 2022: 61.4% 2022 2023: 60.7% 2023 2024: 62.0% 2024 2025: 30.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
201211545.5%
2013532852.8%
2014482654.2%
2015492244.9%
2016401742.5%
2017542342.6%
2018502346.0%
2019532750.9%
2020683450.0%
2021533464.2%
2022573561.4%
2023613760.7%
2024503162.0%
2025692130.4%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 760 0.9% 9.2% 47.4% 1.6%
Action 2 431 0.7% 8.4% 62.9% 3.9%
Action 3 207 0.0% 9.2% 64.3% 5.8%
Action 4 108 0.0% 7.4% 71.3% 6.5%
Action 5 44 0.0% 2.3% 84.1% 0.0%
Action 6 28 0.0% 0.0% 89.3% 7.1%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 76.9% 7.7%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 291 office actions
All years 0.6% 10 of 1,601 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
1.8%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 18, 2024 16/330,900 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Aug. 1, 2023 16/298,944 Affirmed §103
Oct. 21, 2022 16/451,591 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 14, 2019 15/184,667 Affirmed §103
Jan. 29, 2019 13/233,913 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.