Examiner Michael J Schmitt

Grant ratio: 49.8% (69th percentile in Art Unit 1629 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 49.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88651
Primary art unit
1629
Work group
1620
Technology center
1600
Applications
667
Granted applications
332
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7047
Supervisor
Jeffrey Lundgren
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5541

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 38.4% 1.91
Group 252 46.0% 1.76
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 1,228 office actions across 667 applications
Applications with office actions 93.6% 624 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 43 6.4%
1 OA 344 51.6%
2 OAs 140 21.0%
3 OAs 61 9.1%
4 OAs 30 4.5%
5+ OAs 49 7.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 70.4% 2012 2013: 47.5% 2013 2014: 58.8% 2014 2015: 46.3% 2015 2016: 47.9% 2016 2017: 56.1% 2017 2018: 46.9% 2018 2019: 58.3% 2019 2020: 59.5% 2020 2021: 74.4% 2021 2022: 50.0% 2022 2023: 65.2% 2023 2024: 42.9% 2024 2025: 23.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201144100.0%
2012271970.4%
2013401947.5%
2014342058.8%
2015542546.3%
2016482347.9%
2017663756.1%
2018492346.9%
2019482858.3%
2020422559.5%
2021433274.4%
2022321650.0%
2023463065.2%
2024492142.9%
2025421023.8%
20264300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 624 2.6% 12.2% 36.2% 3.4%
Action 2 280 1.4% 11.1% 51.4% 1.8%
Action 3 140 1.4% 10.7% 58.6% 2.9%
Action 4 79 0.0% 7.6% 63.3% 1.3%
Action 5 49 0.0% 4.1% 44.9% 2.0%
Action 6 24 0.0% 4.2% 54.2% 8.3%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 3 of 234 office actions
All years 1.8% 22 of 1,228 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.9%
2.0%
2.8%
2.0%
6.3%
2019: PEG
1.2%
2.6%
1.5%
0.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
1.2%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 6, 2020 15/303,481 Reversed §103
Nov. 21, 2016 13/847,212 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.