Examiner Mark L Shibuya

Grant ratio: 16.2% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 1631 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.79. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 16.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.79
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74453
Primary art unit
1631
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
173
Granted applications
28
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0806
Supervisor
Christopher Low
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0951

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 35.4% 2.35
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 288 office actions across 173 applications
Applications with office actions 94.2% 163 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 5.8%
1 OA 89 51.4%
2 OAs 45 26.0%
3 OAs 15 8.7%
4 OAs 7 4.0%
5+ OAs 7 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.0% 2008 2009: 26.7% 2009 2010: 6.7% 2010 2011: 11.1% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2020: 7.7% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2024: 57.1% 2024 2025: 35.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20084375.0%
200915426.7%
20101516.7%
20119111.1%
2012300.0%
2013200.0%
201411100.0%
20151300.0%
20161000.0%
20201317.7%
20211600.0%
20247457.1%
2025371335.1%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 163 0.6% 11.0% 55.8% 6.7%
Action 2 74 0.0% 8.1% 64.9% 12.2%
Action 3 29 0.0% 6.9% 75.9% 10.3%
Action 4 14 0.0% 14.3% 78.6% 0.0%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 91 office actions
All years 0.3% 1 of 288 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 26, 2016 11/433,069 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 15, 2016 12/564,750 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 27, 2013 11/784,475 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 14, 2012 10/888,029 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 1, 2011 11/437,477 Rehearing Decision-Granted §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2010 11/020,647 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.