Examiner Karlheinz R. Skowronek

Grant ratio: 26.7% (38th percentile in Art Unit 1631 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 26.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82303
Primary art unit
1631
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
217
Granted applications
58

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 35.4% 2.35
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.04 453 office actions across 222 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 222 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 99 44.6%
2 OAs 63 28.4%
3 OAs 32 14.4%
4 OAs 18 8.1%
5+ OAs 10 4.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 15.4% 2008 2009: 26.9% 2009 2010: 42.9% 2010 2011: 26.3% 2011 2012: 30.0% 2012 2013: 14.3% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 20.0% 2016 2017: 11.1% 2017 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 0.0% 2022 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200826415.4%
2009521426.9%
2010492142.9%
2011381026.3%
201210330.0%
20137114.3%
2014200.0%
20155240.0%
20165120.0%
201718211.1%
2021100.0%
2022200.0%
2025200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 222 3.6% 4.5% 71.2% 5.0%
Action 2 123 4.1% 4.9% 74.8% 3.3%
Action 3 60 1.7% 3.3% 78.3% 3.3%
Action 4 28 0.0% 0.0% 82.1% 3.6%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 3 office actions
All years 3.1% 14 of 453 office actions
Change -3.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.8%
2.5%
1.2%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
6.7%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
33.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 5, 2018 11/385,054 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 14, 2016 14/084,986 Affirmed N/A
May. 19, 2016 12/546,231 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 2, 2015 11/807,209 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 12, 2011 10/953,958 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 1, 2010 10/601,378 Affirmed §103
Aug. 24, 2010 11/043,294 Reversed §103
Jun. 25, 2010 11/264,452 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.