Examiner Diana B Johannsen

Grant ratio: 46.1% (71st percentile in Art Unit 1634 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.73. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 46.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.73
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
75804
Primary art unit
1634
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
542
Granted applications
250
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0744
Supervisor
Dave Nguyen
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0731

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 34.1% 2.44
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.56 1,386 office actions across 542 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 542 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 158 29.2%
2 OAs 181 33.4%
3 OAs 73 13.5%
4 OAs 70 12.9%
5+ OAs 60 11.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 29.2% 2008 2009: 38.1% 2009 2010: 54.8% 2010 2011: 63.0% 2011 2012: 44.4% 2012 2013: 25.8% 2013 2014: 25.0% 2014 2015: 41.9% 2015 2016: 39.3% 2016 2017: 58.6% 2017 2018: 56.3% 2018 2019: 55.2% 2019 2020: 64.5% 2020 2021: 84.6% 2021 2022: 68.2% 2022 2023: 65.5% 2023 2024: 61.5% 2024 2025: 28.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200824729.2%
200921838.1%
2010311754.8%
2011271763.0%
201218844.4%
201331825.8%
201428725.0%
2015311341.9%
2016281139.3%
2017291758.6%
2018321856.3%
2019291655.2%
2020312064.5%
2021262284.6%
2022221568.2%
2023291965.5%
2024261661.5%
2025391128.2%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 542 26.6% 12.0% 30.3% 10.5%
Action 2 384 23.2% 7.8% 41.7% 15.6%
Action 3 203 22.7% 4.4% 49.3% 15.8%
Action 4 130 16.9% 3.1% 55.4% 16.9%
Action 5 60 13.3% 1.7% 60.0% 18.3%
Action 6 34 5.9% 5.9% 55.9% 20.6%
Action 7 15 20.0% 6.7% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 10.0% 10.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 38.2% 91 of 238 office actions
All years 22.7% 315 of 1,386 office actions
Change +15.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
3.2%
3.2%
9.2%
2014: Alice
11.0%
18.1%
23.5%
52.1%
37.7%
2019: PEG
28.4%
28.3%
24.7%
24.7%
40.7%
2024: AI examples
43.8%
2025: August memo
35.0%
34.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 31, 2017 12/880,001 Affirmed §101 · §112
Jan. 31, 2017 12/404,772 Affirmed §101 · §112
Sep. 11, 2015 12/006,768 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.