Examiner Tracy Vivlemore

Grant ratio: 73.6% (98th percentile in Art Unit 1635 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.58. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 73.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.58
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80318
Primary art unit
1635
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
707
Granted applications
520
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2914
Supervisor
Dan Sullivan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0900

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 41.0% 1.91
Group 245 37.4% 2.18
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.58 1,120 office actions across 708 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 708 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 419 59.2%
2 OAs 209 29.5%
3 OAs 47 6.6%
4 OAs 26 3.7%
5+ OAs 7 1.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 34.9% 2008 2009: 62.5% 2009 2010: 88.0% 2010 2011: 70.0% 2011 2012: 75.0% 2012 2013: 70.2% 2013 2014: 68.2% 2014 2015: 81.4% 2015 2016: 72.2% 2016 2017: 77.6% 2017 2018: 80.8% 2018 2019: 76.9% 2019 2020: 88.7% 2020 2021: 89.1% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008431534.9%
2009483062.5%
2010504488.0%
2011704970.0%
2012443375.0%
2013574070.2%
2014443068.2%
2015433581.4%
2016362672.2%
2017493877.6%
2018262180.8%
2019524076.9%
2020534788.7%
2021554989.1%
2022272385.2%
2025500.0%
2026500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 708 1.3% 21.5% 56.4% 8.2%
Action 2 289 2.4% 17.3% 54.3% 10.7%
Action 3 80 1.3% 12.5% 57.5% 12.5%
Action 4 33 0.0% 6.1% 66.7% 3.0%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 11 office actions
All years 1.5% 17 of 1,120 office actions
Change -1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.9%
1.5%
1.1%
2014: Alice
4.5%
1.7%
2.8%
6.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 29, 2016 13/656,540 Affirmed §103 · §112
Nov. 29, 2016 13/753,438 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 13, 2015 10/701,264 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 20, 2011 10/448,612 Reversed §103
Sep. 13, 2010 10/352,586 Affirmed §103
Jun. 11, 2010 10/447,839 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.