Examiner Jennifer Pitrak Mcdonald

Grant ratio: 42.7% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 1635 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2020
Grant ratio 42.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.78
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83440
Primary art unit
1635
Work group
1630
Technology center
1600
Applications
482
Granted applications
206

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 40.7% 1.91
Group 245 37.1% 2.18
Tech Center 1,380 37.5% 2.02
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.59 1,302 office actions across 503 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 503 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 175 34.8%
2 OAs 120 23.9%
3 OAs 78 15.5%
4 OAs 67 13.3%
5+ OAs 63 12.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 18.2% 2008 2009: 22.6% 2009 2010: 13.6% 2010 2011: 34.4% 2011 2012: 48.7% 2012 2013: 65.8% 2013 2014: 37.0% 2014 2015: 58.7% 2015 2016: 41.9% 2016 2017: 53.1% 2017 2018: 47.4% 2018 2019: 61.5% 2019 2020: 41.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200833618.2%
200931722.6%
201044613.6%
2011321134.4%
2012391948.7%
2013382565.8%
2014542037.0%
2015462758.7%
2016311341.9%
2017321753.1%
2018381847.4%
2019523261.5%
202012541.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 503 0.8% 21.5% 37.6% 8.0%
Action 2 328 1.2% 21.3% 50.3% 12.2%
Action 3 208 2.4% 18.3% 49.0% 16.3%
Action 4 130 0.8% 15.4% 60.8% 10.8%
Action 5 63 1.6% 22.2% 50.8% 19.0%
Action 6 37 0.0% 16.2% 48.6% 32.4%
Action 7 18 5.6% 27.8% 38.9% 22.2%
Action 8 9 11.1% 55.6% 22.2% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 1 office actions
All years 1.3% 17 of 1,302 office actions
Change -1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
2014: Alice
4.2%
3.1%
3.0%
0.0%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.8%
4.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 10, 2018 13/266,905 Affirmed §100 · §102 · §103
Nov. 17, 2017 13/940,122 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 14, 2016 12/994,856 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 7, 2016 13/879,638 Affirmed §102 · §112
Jun. 7, 2016 11/565,858 Affirmed §103
Apr. 6, 2015 11/041,797 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Feb. 17, 2015 10/701,265 Reversed §103
Mar. 8, 2010 11/871,436 Dismissed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.