Examiner Bao-Thuy L. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 50.8% (58th percentile in Art Unit 1641 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.85. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 50.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.85
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
73403
Primary art unit
1641
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
238
Granted applications
121
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0824
Supervisor
Patricia Mallari
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4729

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 43.3% 2.25
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 447 office actions across 238 applications
Applications with office actions 97.9% 233 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 2.1%
1 OA 102 42.9%
2 OAs 83 34.9%
3 OAs 28 11.8%
4 OAs 14 5.9%
5+ OAs 6 2.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.3% 2008 2009: 69.6% 2009 2010: 70.0% 2010 2011: 58.6% 2011 2013: 5.0% 2013 2018: 100.0% 2018 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 0.0% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008281864.3%
2009563969.6%
2010604270.0%
2011291758.6%
20132015.0%
201822100.0%
2020600.0%
20211700.0%
2022600.0%
202311100.0%
202411100.0%
2025500.0%
2026700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 233 0.9% 7.7% 70.0% 6.9%
Action 2 131 0.0% 3.8% 74.8% 9.2%
Action 3 48 0.0% 2.1% 77.1% 10.4%
Action 4 20 0.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 5 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 13 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 14 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 36 office actions
All years 0.4% 2 of 447 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 14, 2015 10/548,500 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 23, 2012 11/745,283 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Oct. 7, 2010 11/094,498 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 17, 2010 10/718,997 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.