Examiner Yan Xiao

Grant ratio: 62.3% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 1642 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87366
Primary art unit
1642
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
796
Granted applications
496
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3578
Supervisor
Misook Yu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0839

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 42.1% 1.94
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.94 1,541 office actions across 796 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 790 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.8%
1 OA 349 43.8%
2 OAs 256 32.2%
3 OAs 105 13.2%
4 OAs 50 6.3%
5+ OAs 30 3.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 47.2% 2011 2012: 57.6% 2012 2013: 38.2% 2013 2014: 53.3% 2014 2015: 69.0% 2015 2016: 63.8% 2016 2017: 65.3% 2017 2018: 72.7% 2018 2019: 72.3% 2019 2020: 82.7% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 75.0% 2022 2023: 68.4% 2023 2024: 73.3% 2024 2025: 37.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2011361747.2%
2012331957.6%
2013341338.2%
2014603253.3%
2015584069.0%
2016583763.8%
2017493265.3%
2018664872.7%
2019473472.3%
2020756282.7%
2021484287.5%
2022443375.0%
2023573968.4%
2024453373.3%
2025401537.5%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 790 0.5% 21.0% 27.3% 7.3%
Action 2 441 0.7% 16.1% 35.8% 20.4%
Action 3 185 2.7% 11.4% 36.8% 21.1%
Action 4 80 7.5% 10.0% 38.8% 17.5%
Action 5 30 6.7% 10.0% 23.3% 16.7%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 44.4% 33.3%
Action 7 5 40.0% 0.0% 20.0% 20.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.4% 3 of 210 office actions
All years 1.4% 22 of 1,541 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.1%
2014: Alice
10.0%
3.2%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.6%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 1/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 11, 2018 13/000,942 Reversed §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.