Examiner Cheng Lu

Grant ratio: 35.6% (34th percentile in Art Unit 1642 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 35.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.09
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
95754
Primary art unit
1642
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
292
Granted applications
104
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0334
Supervisor
Samira Jean-Louis
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3503

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 39.8% 1.94
Group 221 43.1% 1.95
Tech Center 1,383 37.4% 2.02
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 629 office actions across 292 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 291 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.3%
1 OA 112 38.4%
2 OAs 101 34.6%
3 OAs 36 12.3%
4 OAs 22 7.5%
5+ OAs 20 6.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2020: 66.7% 2020 2021: 52.8% 2021 2022: 65.8% 2022 2023: 61.4% 2023 2024: 45.8% 2024 2025: 20.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20203266.7%
2021361952.8%
2022382565.8%
2023442761.4%
2024482245.8%
202544920.5%
20267900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 291 1.0% 5.2% 29.9% 9.6%
Action 2 179 0.6% 5.6% 25.7% 34.1%
Action 3 78 3.8% 3.8% 23.1% 29.5%
Action 4 42 0.0% 2.4% 31.0% 31.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 45.0% 20.0%
Action 6 8 12.5% 0.0% 62.5% 25.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 7 of 354 office actions
All years 1.3% 8 of 629 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.8%
2025: August memo
3.5%
1.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 29, 2026 16/499,762 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.