Examiner Anne M. Gussow

Grant ratio: 54.2% (67th percentile in Art Unit 1643 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 54.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82940
Primary art unit
1643
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
323
Granted applications
175
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6047
Supervisor
Daniel M. Sullivan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0900

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 37.2% 1.83
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 636 office actions across 323 applications
Applications with office actions 96.0% 310 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 4.0%
1 OA 118 36.5%
2 OAs 113 35.0%
3 OAs 49 15.2%
4 OAs 16 5.0%
5+ OAs 14 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 53.6% 2009 2010: 81.2% 2010 2011: 74.6% 2011 2012: 70.6% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 33.3% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2018: 20.0% 2018 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008281450.0%
2009563053.6%
2010856981.2%
2011594474.6%
2012171270.6%
20132150.0%
2014200.0%
20153133.3%
20161000.0%
201820420.0%
2025400.0%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 310 6.1% 23.2% 32.6% 25.8%
Action 2 192 4.2% 18.2% 33.3% 33.9%
Action 3 79 5.1% 10.1% 48.1% 27.8%
Action 4 30 6.7% 6.7% 63.3% 13.3%
Action 5 14 0.0% 7.1% 35.7% 50.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 28.6%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.3% 2 of 46 office actions
All years 5.2% 33 of 636 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.1%
7.5%
7.9%
6.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
5.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 30, 2017 13/114,921 Affirmed §112
Apr. 16, 2012 11/750,609 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 15, 2010 11/611,554 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.