Examiner Meera Natarajan

Grant ratio: 56.6% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 1643 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 56.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83442
Primary art unit
1643
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
797
Granted applications
451
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3058
Supervisor
Julie Wu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5205

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 37.2% 1.83
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 1,497 office actions across 797 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 794 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 423 53.1%
2 OAs 209 26.2%
3 OAs 78 9.8%
4 OAs 39 4.9%
5+ OAs 45 5.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.1% 2008 2009: 51.1% 2009 2010: 56.0% 2010 2011: 51.2% 2011 2012: 62.7% 2012 2013: 77.3% 2013 2014: 68.1% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 54.5% 2016 2017: 61.4% 2017 2018: 40.6% 2018 2019: 55.7% 2019 2020: 71.2% 2020 2021: 74.4% 2021 2022: 55.6% 2022 2023: 71.1% 2023 2024: 56.4% 2024 2025: 35.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008392564.1%
2009452351.1%
2010251456.0%
2011412151.2%
2012593762.7%
2013443477.3%
2014473268.1%
2015332266.7%
2016331854.5%
2017442761.4%
2018321340.6%
2019613455.7%
2020523771.2%
2021392974.4%
2022452555.6%
2023382771.1%
2024392256.4%
2025311135.5%
20265000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 794 0.9% 15.4% 22.9% 20.2%
Action 2 371 0.5% 16.4% 31.8% 16.7%
Action 3 162 1.9% 16.7% 42.6% 14.2%
Action 4 84 4.8% 11.9% 45.2% 10.7%
Action 5 45 2.2% 8.9% 46.7% 11.1%
Action 6 19 5.3% 0.0% 57.9% 10.5%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 4 of 190 office actions
All years 1.2% 18 of 1,497 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
4.7%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
6.6%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.6%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
6.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 21, 2018 14/287,599 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 28, 2017 12/395,159 Affirmed §103
Jul. 26, 2016 12/433,737 Affirmed §103
Jun. 16, 2015 12/250,396 Reversed N/A
Jun. 12, 2014 12/612,912 Dismissed N/A
Nov. 8, 2010 10/996,597 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2010 11/655,895 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.