Examiner Ron Schwadron, Ph.D

Grant ratio: 20.5% (13th percentile in Art Unit 1644 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2017
Grant ratio 20.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.63
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
71324
Primary art unit
1644
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
425
Granted applications
87

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 40.8% 2.08
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.25 1,044 office actions across 465 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 465 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 201 43.2%
2 OAs 127 27.3%
3 OAs 52 11.2%
4 OAs 40 8.6%
5+ OAs 45 9.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 9.7% 2008 2009: 14.0% 2009 2010: 17.8% 2010 2011: 18.2% 2011 2012: 22.2% 2012 2013: 15.0% 2013 2014: 25.5% 2014 2015: 16.3% 2015 2016: 29.3% 2016 2017: 32.6% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083139.7%
200943614.0%
201045817.8%
201144818.2%
2012451022.2%
201340615.0%
2014471225.5%
201543716.3%
2016411229.3%
2017461532.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 465 0.4% 27.1% 56.6% 11.2%
Action 2 264 0.8% 24.2% 54.5% 14.8%
Action 3 137 0.7% 20.4% 51.8% 20.4%
Action 4 85 2.4% 17.6% 51.8% 24.7%
Action 5 45 0.0% 17.8% 66.7% 13.3%
Action 6 28 0.0% 14.3% 64.3% 21.4%
Action 7 10 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 7 of 1,044 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.9%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 18 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
5.0% 1/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
10.0% 2/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 28, 2019 13/524,837 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
May. 9, 2019 13/790,771 Affirmed §103
Jul. 20, 2018 13/716,469 Reversed §112
Dec. 14, 2017 13/114,122 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
Oct. 5, 2017 13/617,059 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 27, 2017 13/682,037 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112 · §120
Mar. 14, 2017 13/037,784 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 20, 2016 13/740,277 Affirmed §101 · §102
Dec. 15, 2016 13/214,767 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2016 13/409,855 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 18, 2016 10/350,096 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 16, 2016 13/349,755 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.