Examiner Vanessa L. Ford

Grant ratio: 35.9% (24th percentile in Art Unit 1645 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 35.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78522
Primary art unit
1645
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
220
Granted applications
79
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0857
Supervisor
Vanessa L Ford
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0857

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 47.8% 2.04
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.78 391 office actions across 220 applications
Applications with office actions 94.1% 207 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 13 5.9%
1 OA 97 44.1%
2 OAs 60 27.3%
3 OAs 37 16.8%
4 OAs 9 4.1%
5+ OAs 4 1.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.7% 2008 2009: 49.3% 2009 2010: 46.2% 2010 2011: 45.8% 2011 2012: 20.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2020: 0.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008351645.7%
2009673349.3%
2010391846.2%
2011241145.8%
20125120.0%
2013400.0%
2014100.0%
2020100.0%
20211400.0%
2025500.0%
20262500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 207 0.0% 25.1% 48.8% 22.2%
Action 2 110 0.0% 22.7% 45.5% 22.7%
Action 3 50 2.0% 22.0% 50.0% 22.0%
Action 4 13 7.7% 38.5% 38.5% 7.7%
Action 5 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 36 office actions
All years 0.5% 2 of 391 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 3/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 4/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 11, 2015 12/165,847 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 15, 2013 11/499,432 Affirmed §103
Feb. 12, 2013 10/416,262 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 11, 2013 11/544,056 Affirmed §103
Aug. 20, 2012 12/498,293 Affirmed §103
May. 29, 2012 10/194,805 Affirmed §103
Nov. 10, 2011 11/046,721 Reversed §103
Sep. 26, 2011 11/156,502 Reversed §103
Aug. 17, 2011 11/039,506 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 29, 2010 11/184,495 Reversed §103
May. 20, 2010 10/018,373 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Mar. 8, 2010 10/976,371 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.