Examiner Prema Mertz

Grant ratio: 66.0% (98th percentile in Art Unit 1646 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
72602
Primary art unit
1646
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
788
Granted applications
520
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0876
Supervisor
Vanessa L Ford
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0857

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 41.9% 1.89
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 1,325 office actions across 788 applications
Applications with office actions 97.2% 766 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 22 2.8%
1 OA 431 54.7%
2 OAs 219 27.8%
3 OAs 59 7.5%
4 OAs 27 3.4%
5+ OAs 30 3.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 72.3% 2008 2009: 69.0% 2009 2010: 72.0% 2010 2011: 64.7% 2011 2012: 63.3% 2012 2013: 54.2% 2013 2014: 63.2% 2014 2015: 67.7% 2015 2016: 81.1% 2016 2017: 66.0% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 60.0% 2019 2020: 87.9% 2020 2021: 93.4% 2021 2022: 77.8% 2022 2023: 61.9% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024 2025: 31.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008473472.3%
2009584069.0%
2010503672.0%
2011342264.7%
2012603863.3%
2013482654.2%
2014382463.2%
2015312167.7%
2016373081.1%
2017473166.0%
2018362466.7%
2019352160.0%
2020665887.9%
2021615793.4%
2022181477.8%
2023211361.9%
2024302170.0%
2025321031.3%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 766 1.2% 12.1% 33.6% 39.3%
Action 2 335 1.8% 11.3% 37.9% 37.3%
Action 3 116 0.9% 5.2% 52.6% 31.9%
Action 4 57 3.5% 1.8% 56.1% 28.1%
Action 5 30 6.7% 3.3% 40.0% 36.7%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 28.6%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 141 office actions
All years 1.5% 20 of 1,325 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
2014: Alice
2.1%
3.2%
1.4%
4.3%
7.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
8.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 9, 2022 15/610,267 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Dec. 27, 2011 12/436,508 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.