Examiner Michael Pak

Grant ratio: 54.0% (60th percentile in Art Unit 1646 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 54.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.37
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
73476
Primary art unit
1646
Work group
1640
Technology center
1600
Applications
726
Granted applications
392
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0879
Supervisor
Vanessa L Ford
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-0857

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 41.9% 1.89
Group 222 43.5% 1.94
Tech Center 1,373 38.0% 2.02
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 1,700 office actions across 726 applications
Applications with office actions 97.7% 709 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 17 2.3%
1 OA 244 33.6%
2 OAs 232 32.0%
3 OAs 100 13.8%
4 OAs 62 8.5%
5+ OAs 71 9.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 57.7% 2008 2009: 52.7% 2009 2010: 62.5% 2010 2011: 55.2% 2011 2012: 34.6% 2012 2013: 30.6% 2013 2014: 52.4% 2014 2015: 65.9% 2015 2016: 58.5% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017 2018: 54.1% 2018 2019: 60.5% 2019 2020: 68.4% 2020 2021: 64.3% 2021 2022: 70.3% 2022 2023: 77.8% 2023 2024: 70.6% 2024 2025: 28.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008261557.7%
2009552952.7%
2010322062.5%
2011291655.2%
201226934.6%
2013361130.6%
2014633352.4%
2015412765.9%
2016533158.5%
2017442250.0%
2018372054.1%
2019432660.5%
2020382668.4%
2021281864.3%
2022372670.3%
2023362877.8%
2024342470.6%
2025381128.9%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 709 2.3% 29.8% 27.5% 23.3%
Action 2 465 3.0% 23.0% 29.0% 30.3%
Action 3 233 4.7% 12.4% 31.8% 34.8%
Action 4 133 3.8% 14.3% 30.1% 39.8%
Action 5 71 7.0% 14.1% 40.8% 23.9%
Action 6 45 0.0% 15.6% 37.8% 35.6%
Action 7 20 5.0% 25.0% 40.0% 30.0%
Action 8 11 9.1% 9.1% 54.5% 27.3%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 188 office actions
All years 3.1% 53 of 1,700 office actions
Change -2.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
3.4%
3.0%
2014: Alice
10.5%
2.8%
2.4%
4.3%
5.1%
2019: PEG
2.2%
2.2%
5.5%
5.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 2, 2023 15/736,088 Reversed §103
Jul. 15, 2022 14/625,086 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 2, 2019 14/496,651 Affirmed §101 · §112
Aug. 24, 2018 13/215,464 Affirmed in part §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.